Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Students as Leaders of Learning - A Partnering Pedagogy

Students as Leaders of Learning - A Partnering Pedagogy
(this is a work in progress)

Who are we teaching - Who are we creating?

In trying to imagine the ideal student to teach, we must look outside and beyond schools, into what our ideal school leaver looks like. Many people would agree that independent decision making, critical questioning and thought, self reflective analysis and the capacity to lead themselves and others are some of key factors to a successful post-school life at either university or at work. Yet the majority of our schooling does not allow for this ideal to be considered let alone reached.

We must also consider who today's students really are. Our youth generation are fluent in a multitude of technologies, not taught through schools but learned from experimentation, their peers and the endless array of resources available on the Internet. Changes in communication, collaboration and creativity have opened new worlds of opportunities for them that they have taken despite the lack of engagement in these technologies in our schools and teachers.

Finally we must consider what these students want from their schooling. Mark Prensky in his book Teaching Digital Natives highlights several key factors that most students want:
  • They do not want to be lectured to,
  • They want to be respected, trusted and have their opinions valued,
  • They want to follow their own interests and passions,
  • They want to create, using the tools of their time,
  • They want to work with their peers and group and project work (but ensure that lazy students are identified),
  • They want to make decisions and share control,
  • They want to connect with peers to express and share opinions, in class and around the world,
  • They want to cooperate and compete with each other,
  • They want an education that is nor just relevant but real.
In my time discussing what students want from school, both formally for research and informally, similar issues have arisen. Indeed many teachers would like to redress many of these issues for the benefit of the student but feel compelled to continue with the way they are going because the 'System' of education is not conducive to this ideal, because of the ever increasing number of targets and data driven accountability and because of the fear of failure seen in all schools. None of these as good enough excuses for me however.

Can it be done?
 
David Gauntlett in Making in Connecting, wrote this from an imagined future;


it has been realized that memorizing stuff for tests is the antithesis of real learning, which takes place through meaningful activity. This shift turned out to be somewhat easier that expected, once government policies had been changed, since most teachers had tended to doubt the value of shovelling information in pursuit of test scores. In the new system, students work on learning projects, in which their teachers encourage them to ask questions and to seek out understanding for themselves. To present their learning to others, they produce exhibitions, physical performances, online presentations, and games. They are inspired by their teachers, who are no longer just the holders of the 'answer book' but are visibly also learning new knowledge and skills in their own lives.

This outlook may seem over ambitious and unrealistic to some, however it is entirely realistic and achievable. My argument is that there does not need be a Government policy (though this would certainly make things easier) but is achievable now, with our current 'systems', curriculums and schools.

At the heart of this is fostering an environment where students can truly be leaders of their own learning. I have done exactly this for two years now in my current school and am finally getting heard about the ways that this can personally help every student.

I am due to hold a teacher training session about this new Pedagogy next week and will again investigate it at the Media Education Association conference at the BFI in February. The workshop will explore how to develop a culture of learning where students become leaders of their own learning. With staff and delegates as the learners, they will be in control of the direction, speed and outcome of the session. They will learn some of the theoretical aspects of ‘students as leaders of learning’, but perhaps more importantly see for themselves how to implement these theories into practice back in the classroom. I will not be lecturing about all the wonderful ways I engage students to be active self directed learners, rather I will practice what I preach and ensure that they have the opportunity to lead their learning in metalearning way

I will write a follow up post with the suggestions that the groups had, as well as the things that I've done to enable this, so watch this space.

4 comments:

  1. Hi Spencer,

    You asked on Twitter for my comments on this post. Well, unsurprisingly, I like it all a lot!

    You're quite right that Government policy doesn't need to change *necessarily* and that we can make a start on it here and now. Indeed, it's what we *should* do.

    But things would be much easier if those of us who want to teach (or rather, encourage learning) in this way did not have to feel that we are swimming against the tide all the time.

    It would be better if both our bosses, and our students, expected this kind of thing. (At the moment even conservative students feel they have right on their side when they say "You're not meant to be making us do this! You are paid to deliver lectures to us!" - not that anyone has said this to me, per se, but sometimes you feel that even students think you're being improper when you try to engage them with the learning process!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for your comments David.

      You are entirely right about it being easier if our bosses and students expected this. I get students like that a lot in the first few weeks of my courses, but over time they do get used to that way of working (I guess I'm lucky that I have the same small groups of students every week for the whole year).

      I think we have to try to embed this practice at an earlier stage of their secondary education. It happens a lot in primary education but as soon as they move to secondary the fun, creativity, exploration and working towards long term projects is taken away. It seems that it then takes several years for university students to regain the ability to lead their learning (this is not based on research but on pub talk)

      Delete
  2. It takes a willingness to get it wrong and accept the possibility for absolute chaos in your classroom from the teacher. With my Year 10 Media students I have to break all the bad habits they have learnt throughout the rest of their secondary experience which is only done through getting them to work in the way you want. They will get it wrong over and over again but they will eventually come round to this way of working and when they do they are in many cases unstoppable. The problem is having the courage to persevere and implement this kind of learning in your classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As well as significant resources and sympathetic courses. If vocational courses become "not worth the paper they are printed on" as looks increasingly likely where will we find the freedom to implement these types of pedagogy. Vocational courses lend themselves well to a student led approach GCSE's perhaps less so? I worry that a lot of the changes I have made to the way I teach and students learn in my classes will be reversed if we don't fight for the value of vocational courses.

    ReplyDelete